Environmental Interventions for Preventing Atopic Diseases.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: In this review, we detail the exposome (consisting of environmental factors such as diet, microbial colonization, allergens, pollutants, and stressors), mechanistic and clinical research supporting its influence on atopic disease, and potentiation from climate change. We highlight contemporary environmental interventions and available evidence substantiating their roles in atopic disease prevention, from observational cohorts to randomized controlled trials, when available. RECENT FINDINGS: Early introduction to allergenic foods is an effective primary prevention strategy to reduce food allergy. Diverse dietary intake also appears to be a promising strategy for allergic disease prevention, but additional study is necessary. Air pollution and tobacco smoke are highly associated with allergic disease, among other medical comorbidities, paving the way for campaigns and legislation to reduce these exposures. There is no clear evidence that oral vitamin D supplementation, prebiotic or probiotic supplementation, daily emollient application, and antiviral prophylaxis are effective in preventing atopic disease, but these interventions require further study. While some environmental interventions have a well-defined role in the prevention of atopic disease, additional study of many remaining interventions is necessary to enhance our understanding of their role in disease prevention. Alignment of research findings from randomized controlled trials with public policy is essential to develop meaningful public health outcomes and prevent allergic disease on the population level.

Implementing Food Oral Immunotherapy Into Clinical Practice: Quality and Safety Perspectives From a US Academic Center.

Oral immunotherapy (OIT) is an accessible procedure for practicing allergy/immunology providers, yet rigorous safety standards are limited in the clinical setting. By exploring the transition from research to clinical practice OIT, we review relevant safety considerations necessary for the clinical provider. We offer a perspective on clinical benefits and considerations at the individual, collaboration, and policy levels from the vantage of a large academic OIT program, and we propose several practical start-up checklists and clerical considerations for practicing providers. Awareness of the local population and front-end planning is necessary to improve the accessibility of this procedure in clinical practice among racial and socioeconomic minority populations. Sharing and merging OIT protocols, procedural methods, and electronic medical record order sets may increase harmonization among OIT-providing institutions and further our abilities to pool safety and outcomes data, ultimately enhancing the safety and efficacy of clinical OIT.

Preventing allergies through the skin.

OBJECTIVE: To inform readers of the current and forthcoming skin barrier interventions that have clinically relevant implications in the prevention of allergic sensitization and atopic diseases. DATA SOURCES: Peer-reviewed journal articles indexed on PubMed and clinical trials referenced on clinicaltrials.gov were analyzed. STUDY SELECTIONS: Literature searches from PubMed and clinicaltrials.gov were performed using combinations of the following search terms: prevention, allergy, atopy, skin, cutaneous, microbiome, microbiota, Staphylococcus aureus, atopic dermatitis, eczema, food allergy, and asthma. RESULTS: The skin barrier represents an entry point for allergic sensitization and TH2-mediated allergic disorders. Results from clinical trials designed to improve microbiome complexity and reduce S aureus colonization, provide skin barrier enhancement, and deliver epicutaneous immunotherapy are summarized and discussed in the context of primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention of allergic disease. CONCLUSION: The skin barrier is a promising target for prevention of allergic disease, though clinical trial results thus far have been mixed, at best.

Yield prediction in parallel homogeneous assembly.

We investigate the parallel assembly of two-dimensional, geometrically-closed modular target structures out of homogeneous sets of macroscopic components of varying anisotropy. The yield predicted by a chemical reaction network (CRN)-based model is quantitatively shown to reproduce experimental results over a large set of conditions. Scaling laws for parallel assembling systems are then derived from the model. By extending the validity of the CRN-based modelling, this work prompts analysis and solutions to the incompatible substructure problem.

Comparison of systemic reactions in rush, cluster, and standard-build aeroallergen immunotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Given the choice of standard, cluster, and rush build-up for aeroallergen immunotherapy, standard-build immunotherapy has generally been preferred because of a perceived high rate of systemic reactions (SRs) associated with cluster and rush immunotherapy. OBJECTIVE: To characterize the incidence of SRs during standard, cluster, and rush build-up immunotherapy in an allergy practice during a 5-year period. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted among patients receiving standard-build, 8- to 10-step cluster, or 2-day rush immunotherapy from January 1, 2010, through December 31, 2014, at Family Allergy & Asthma clinics in Louisville, Kentucky. Investigators excluded reactions that occurred during skin prick testing, venom immunotherapy, and not-true SRs, and identified the build-up method, age, sex, date of reaction, vial concentration, and presence of asthma. Per-shot and per-patient incidence of SRs was computed from these data. RESULTS: During our review period, 2,549,643 injections were administered to 11,982 patients. Per-shot incidence of SR was 0.01%, 0.06%, and 0.33% for standard, cluster, and rush immunotherapy, respectively; per-patient incidence of SR was 2.84%, 2.52%, and 11.86% for standard, cluster, and rush immunotherapy, respectively. A total of 42% of SRs were grade 1, 43% were grade 2, 12% were grade 3, and 3% were grade 4. No fatalities were reported. A total of 70% of total SRs, 75% of cluster SR, and 55% of rush SR occurred in females, with an emergent peak in SR from May to October. CONCLUSION: Compared with previously published rates, we observed a decrease in the incidence of SR for standard, cluster, and rush immunotherapy, with peak seasonality from May to October and a female predominance.

Development of a standardized method for motion testing in pulse oximeters.

BACKGROUND: Pulse oximeter performance in the presence of motion varies among devices and manufacturers because of variations in hardware, software, testing, and calibration. Compounding these differences is a lack of uniform characterization of motion, and the consequential effects of motion upon the wide range of normal and abnormal human physiology. Traditional motion testing attempts to standardize motion into a reproducible form by using a mechanical jig to produce passive motion of a known amplitude and frequency. This type of motion challenge fails to account for the physiologic changes induced by active movement. METHODS: We postulate that a more appropriate method for testing the performance of pulse oximeters in the presence of motion is to create a feedback control loop between the device and the test subject, providing a reproducible, actively created, and controlled motion test suitable for standardized testing among manufacturers. It is hoped that relying on a signal as seen from the oximeter's perspective will enable the creation of a sensitive and reproducible test method capable of separating those oximeters that can reject motion artifact from those that cannot. RESULTS: Preliminary results have concentrated on building the tools and clinical protocols needed to evaluate this method. Some basic observations are reported, but insufficient numbers of experienced subjects precludes rigorous conclusions. CONCLUSION: We have set the stage for a feasibility demonstration using a novel form of testing. With sufficient subjects and proper statistical evaluation, a robust test method for assessing the performance of pulse oximeters in the presence of motion may be at hand.